Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured checklist that externalizes design rationale to AGENTS.md and stays focused on actionable decisions and validation. It would benefit only from an explicit validate-fix-retry loop in the Validate section.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop to the Validate section (e.g., 'If a check fails, fix the rule and re-run until clean') to push workflow_clarity to 5.
Optionally pair the abstract design directives ('Choose the anchor first') with a one-line concrete example to strengthen actionability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean working checklist that defers rationale to AGENTS.md and assumes Claude's competence; every line earns its place with no padded concept explanations. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete actionable items ("Explicit Lifecycle semantics and stable FingerprintFields", "make finding-dsl-check policy-rule-check ...") are present, but several design directives like "Choose the anchor first" are guidance rather than copy-paste steps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Decide -> Needs -> Test matrix -> Validate sequence with concrete make targets, though the Validate section lacks an explicit fix-and-retry feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, well-organized into clearly headed sections, with the single rationale reference (AGENTS.md) one level deep and clearly signaled; no bundle bloat. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |