Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured instruction set that assumes Claude's competence and includes concrete commands plus a verification checkpoint. The main gap is the absence of an executable example test and an explicit validate-and-retry loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient with no padding or over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every step earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable — table-driven Go tests, the specific `-count=1 -v` flag, `make verify`, and enumerated boundary categories — but lacks a copy-paste example test, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered reproduce → write → secure → fixture → run sequence is present with a verification checkpoint (`-count=1 -v` then `make verify`), but the validate-fix-retry feedback loop is only implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This simple, single-purpose skill is well under 50 lines with no need for external references and is organized into clear Instructions and Success Criteria sections, meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |