Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, mostly lean skill body with an explicitly validated workflow and clear one-level-deep reference navigation. It would reach the top band by inlining a concrete grounding-check example and resolving the `scripts/check_vault.py` path against an actual bundle file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — a compact three-layer table, direct commands, and no padding about what git or Markdown are — with only minor intro/scope prose that could be trimmed, fitting the 'efficient; minor over-explanation' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready artifacts (the page-header template, `git diff --stat 5b237fa..HEAD -- …`, `python3 scripts/check_vault.py --strict`), but the grounding-check mechanism is described procedurally and delegated to references rather than shown as an executable inline example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 5-step Workflow (Ingest → Compile → Check → Garbage collect → Update the map) with an explicit validation checkpoint ('Run the grounding check and the drift check before committing'), a fix-and-retry feedback loop, and a reinforcing commit gate. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-signaled one-level-deep reference (`references/details.md`) with a 'Going deeper' section whose enumerated contents match the file's actual headers; minor gap: the commit gate references `scripts/check_vault.py` but no `scripts/` bundle exists — the script source lives inside references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |