Debug complex issues using competing hypotheses with parallel investigation, evidence collection, and root cause arbitration. Use this skill when debugging bugs with multiple potential causes, performing root cause analysis, or organizing parallel investigation workflows.
84
81%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Hypothesis generation across failure categories
Logic Error hypothesis
0%
100%
Data Issue hypothesis
0%
100%
State Problem hypothesis
0%
100%
Integration Failure hypothesis
0%
100%
Resource Issue hypothesis
0%
100%
Environment hypothesis
0%
100%
Failure mode labeled
0%
100%
Falsifiable statements
60%
100%
Investigation Scope
80%
100%
Confirming evidence criteria
80%
70%
Falsifying evidence criteria
11%
44%
Report Format section
100%
71%
Evidence collection and citation standards
file:line citation format
26%
100%
Evidence type labels
0%
100%
Confidence with percentage
0%
100%
Verdict from prescribed set
100%
100%
Confirming Evidence section
50%
100%
Contradicting Evidence section
0%
100%
Causal Chain
58%
100%
Recommended Fix
90%
100%
Additional Notes section
20%
100%
Report title structure
100%
100%
Result arbitration and fix validation
All hypotheses categorized
58%
100%
Hypothesis A = Confirmed
100%
100%
Hypothesis B = Confirmed
100%
100%
Hypothesis C = Falsified
62%
100%
Hypothesis D ≠ Confirmed
100%
100%
Compound root cause declared
100%
100%
Fix validation: addresses root cause
100%
100%
Fix validation: no new issues
71%
100%
Fix validation: original case no longer fails
100%
100%
Fix validation: edge cases covered
100%
100%
Fix validation: tests updated
100%
100%
Hypothesis D flagged for follow-up
100%
100%
Arbitration decision path documented
60%
100%
91fe43e
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.