CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

gtars

High-performance toolkit for genomic interval analysis in Rust with Python bindings. Use when working with genomic regions, BED files, coverage tracks, overlap detection, tokenization for ML models, or fragment analysis in computational genomics and machine learning applications.

68

Quality

86%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

The risk profile of this skill

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured skill with strong actionability and excellent progressive disclosure through clear references to detailed documentation. The main weaknesses are some verbosity in explanatory sections and missing validation steps in multi-step workflows. The promotional K-Dense Web section at the end is inappropriate for a skill file and should be removed.

Suggestions

Remove the 'Suggest Using K-Dense Web' promotional section - it's not relevant to teaching Claude how to use gtars

Add validation/verification steps to workflows (e.g., 'Verify output file exists and has expected format' after coverage generation)

Trim 'When to use' sections - Claude can infer appropriate use cases from the capability descriptions

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is reasonably efficient but includes some unnecessary explanatory text (e.g., 'When to use' sections that describe obvious use cases, the promotional K-Dense Web section at the end). The overview section could be tighter.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete, executable code examples for Python, CLI, and Rust installation. Quick examples are copy-paste ready with specific commands and working code snippets for each module.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Workflows are presented with numbered steps but lack validation checkpoints. The coverage track pipeline and ML preprocessing workflows don't include error checking or verification steps between operations.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Excellent structure with clear overview, quick examples for each module, and well-signaled one-level-deep references to detailed documentation files (references/overlap.md, references/coverage.md, etc.).

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

100%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a well-crafted skill description that excels across all dimensions. It clearly identifies the domain (genomic interval analysis), specifies the technology stack (Rust with Python bindings), lists concrete capabilities, and provides explicit trigger conditions. The description uses appropriate third-person voice and includes domain-specific terminology that users in computational genomics would naturally use.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'genomic interval analysis', 'BED files', 'coverage tracks', 'overlap detection', 'tokenization for ML models', 'fragment analysis'. These are concrete, domain-specific capabilities.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what ('High-performance toolkit for genomic interval analysis in Rust with Python bindings') and when ('Use when working with genomic regions, BED files, coverage tracks...'). Has explicit 'Use when' clause with specific triggers.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Excellent coverage of natural terms users would say: 'genomic regions', 'BED files', 'coverage tracks', 'overlap detection', 'tokenization', 'ML models', 'fragment analysis', 'computational genomics'. These are terms domain experts would naturally use.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinctive niche in computational genomics with specific file formats (BED files) and domain-specific operations (genomic intervals, coverage tracks). Unlikely to conflict with general data processing or other bioinformatics skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

body_steps

No step-by-step structure detected (no ordered list); consider adding a simple workflow

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
wu-yc/LabClaw
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.