Content
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-organized and information-rich, but it leans verbose in concept explanation, uses pseudocode rather than real tool-call examples, and lacks validation checkpoints in its workflow. As a monolithic single file it also underuses progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Replace the pseudocode `discover_gwas_genes(...)` calls in Best Practices with actual ToolUniverse tool invocations so examples are executable.
Add an explicit validation/retry step to the workflow (e.g. verify association counts and p-value filtering before ranking) to earn workflow_clarity at the top level.
Trim the Key Concepts and Data Sources sections of background Claude already knows, and move the full tool reference plus output schema into a separate references file linked from the body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with useful reference material (tool lists, output schema, examples), but the Key Concepts section explains basics Claude already knows (e.g. "Accounts for multiple testing burden across ~1M common variants") and the Data Sources/Citation sections pad the token budget. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete tool names, parameters, and an output schema, but the "Best Practices" code blocks call a pseudocode `discover_gwas_genes(...)` function rather than real ToolUniverse tool invocations, so examples are not copy-paste executable. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with arrows is present, but it lacks explicit validation checkpoints or a fix-and-retry feedback loop; for a batch data-aggregation operation this caps the score at 2 per the rubric. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the body is a monolithic ~230-line single file; sections are well-organized but content that could be split out (full tool reference, output schema, citation) is inline with no one-level-deep references. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |