Content
62%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable outbreak-response workflow with strong validation scaffolding, but it is verbose (heavy illustrative output tables), its code relies on several undefined helper functions, and its only external reference points to a missing file.
Suggestions
Trim the fabricated example-output tables (docking scores, PMIDs, NCT IDs, citation counts) to compact format stubs; the report template already conveys the output shape, so the per-phase samples are redundant tokens.
Define or inline the undefined helper functions (classify_type, assess_druggability, parse_plddt, get_high_confidence, identify_binding_site, rank_targets, deduplicate) so the code blocks are fully copy-paste executable, or explicitly mark them as conceptual placeholders.
Create the referenced TOOLS_REFERENCE.md (or remove the broken link) and consider moving per-phase deep-dive content into one-level-deep reference files so SKILL.md reads as a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Domain content is mostly efficient, but the ~750-line body is padded with extensive fabricated example-output tables (docking scores 0.92, specific PMIDs/NCT IDs, citation counts '5,234') that largely duplicate the report template's format; not a score-1 because it does not lecture on basics Claude already knows, but not lean enough for 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete tool calls with specific parameters (e.g. tu.tools.NvidiaNIM_diffdock(protein=..., ligand=smiles, num_poses=5)) and a parameter-correction table, but the code is not fully copy-paste ready because it calls undefined helpers (classify_type, assess_druggability, parse_plddt, rank_targets, deduplicate), placing it at 2 rather than 3. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear phased sequence (Phase 0-6) with explicit validation checkpoints (Phase 0 tool verification, pLDDT quality gates), a completeness checklist, and fallback chains as error-recovery feedback loops — matching the score-3 anchor rather than the checkpoint-missing anchor at 2. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are organized, but the body is a monolithic 750-line wall with per-phase detail inline that could be split out, and the single one-level reference ([TOOLS_REFERENCE.md]) is well-signaled yet does not exist in any bundle directory — a broken reference — so it does not reach the well-split, easy-navigation bar of 3. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |