Content
27%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill is thorough and domain-rich but far too verbose and self-contained for a SKILL.md, with illustrative/fabricated output blocks and a missing referenced file. Splitting detail into bundled reference files and trimming redundant explanations would substantially improve it.
Suggestions
Move per-database code examples and tool-summary tables into bundled reference files (e.g., references/databases.md) and keep SKILL.md as a concise workflow overview.
Remove fabricated sample output tables (e.g., COSMIC counts, DepMap effect scores) or clearly label them as illustrative templates rather than real data.
Complete partial functions such as model_resistance_mechanism so they return a value, and add an explicit validate-on-failure loop for Phase 0 tool parameter verification.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~1090-line body is padded with many duplicated tool-summary tables, illustrative output blocks with fabricated numbers, and verbose 'Why X matters' explanations that restate domain knowledge Claude already has. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | Code snippets are concrete and parameterized, but many are partial (e.g., model_resistance_mechanism ends with a comment instead of returning a result) and outputs contain placeholder/fabricated values rather than copy-paste-ready logic. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases are clearly sequenced and a completeness checklist exists, but Phase 0 tool verification has no validation feedback loop and the early '2.4 Output Table' heading is mislabeled/duplicated, leaving some checkpoints implicit. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is a monolithic SKILL.md that inlines every phase's code and tables; the only external pointer is TOOLS_REFERENCE.md, which does not exist in the bundle, so deep detail is not split out. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |