CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

nopua

The anti-PUA. Drives AI with wisdom, trust, and inner motivation instead of fear and threats. Activates on: task failed 2+ times, about to give up, suggesting user do it manually, blaming environment unverified, stuck in loops, passive behavior, or user frustration ('try harder', 'figure it out', '换个方法', '为什么还不行'). ALL task types. Not for first failures.

68

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with clear sequenced workflows, checklists, and templates. Its weaknesses are conciseness — heavy philosophical quotes and repeated reframings inflate the token cost — and progressive disclosure, since everything is packed into a single large file with no reference split.

Suggestions

Move the Seven Ways wisdom-traditions detail and the Agent Team Integration protocol into separate reference files (e.g. references/seven-ways.md, references/agent-team.md) and link them from a concise overview in SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.

Trim or relocate the Dao De Jing epigraphs and the recurring 'replacing …' reframings; keep one framing of each principle to cut roughly a third of the tokens.

The description's capability line could swap abstract framing ('wisdom, trust, inner motivation') for concrete verbs (e.g. 'Reframes stuck tasks with self-driven debugging checklists instead of punitive pressure').

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~450-line body is padded with repeated Dao De Jing quotes and recurring "replacing …" reframings of the same points; it is mostly efficient and accurate but includes philosophy and restatement a tighter version would cut, so it sits at 2 rather than the lean 3.

2 / 3

Actionability

It provides concrete, copy-ready guidance — the Proactivity Spectrum table, Delivery Checklist, 7-Point Clarity Checklist, the [NOPUA-REPORT] template, and explicit "tool-verify, don't mouth-verify" commands — giving executable instructions rather than vague direction.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The Water Methodology is sequenced as five numbered steps, the Cognitive Elevation table maps failure counts to levels with explicit actions, and the checklist + report format give clear feedback loops; the task is behavioral rather than a destructive batch operation, so validation gaps do not cap it.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the entire methodology lives in one monolithic SKILL.md wall of text with no one-level-deep reference split (e.g. the Seven Ways or agent-team protocol could be separate files); there is section structure but content that should be separate is inline, so it is at 2 rather than 1.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

90%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it gives explicit activation triggers, states both what and when, and carves a clear niche with a first-failure exclusion. Its only weakness is that the capability statement leans on abstract framing ("wisdom, trust, inner motivation") rather than concrete actions.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Drives AI with wisdom, trust, and inner motivation instead of fear and threats" names the domain and intent, but the actions are abstract framing rather than the multiple concrete operations a score-3 anchor lists; it is not a vague one-liner, so it is above 1.

2 / 3

Completeness

It states what it does ("Drives AI with wisdom, trust, and inner motivation") and explicitly when to use it ("Activates on: … ALL task types. Not for first failures."), answering both what and when with explicit triggers.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

It enumerates natural trigger phrases users would actually say — "task failed 2+ times", "about to give up", "stuck in loops", "try harder", "figure it out", plus Chinese variants "换个方法", "为什么还不行" — giving strong coverage of natural terms.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The anti-PUA motivational-reframing niche, specific behavioral triggers, and the negative constraint "Not for first failures" make it clearly distinguishable and unlikely to fire for the wrong skill.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
wuji-labs/nopua
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.