Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, directive skill body that offloads detail to three clearly signaled reference files and gives precise output constraints. The workflow is clearly sequenced but could add an explicit self-check/validation step on the generated prompts before final output.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint in the workflow (e.g., re-read the generated prompt against the 3-5 reproduction-critical anchors and confirm none were lost) before emitting the final output.
Tighten the Positive Prompt and Negative Prompt enumerated checklists into more compact guidance to reduce token load without losing the concrete constraints.
Consider condensing the Medium Boundaries bullet list into a shorter rule set, since several bullets restate the same 'exclude other media' idea for different mediums.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and directive with no padding about basic concepts Claude already knows; each section earns its place, though a few enumerated lists (e.g., the full Positive-Prompt checklist and Negative-Prompt categories) could be tightened slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly actionable instruction-only guidance with concrete constraints: 450-700 Chinese characters, ordered Chinese:/English: sections, 10-15 comma-separated negative phrases, and explicit placement rules (first third = visual anchors). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 9-step sequence from inspection to final output with explicit conditional branching (illustration-style applied only when relevant), but it lacks an explicit validation/feedback checkpoint on the produced prompts before output. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured overview pointing via clear markdown links to three real one-level-deep reference files (analysis-framework.md, category-guides.md, illustration-style.md), with conditional loading guidance so unrelated references are skipped. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |