Conciseness

Mostly efficient structured guidance, but it is noticeably long (~390 lines) and re-explains Qt concepts Claude already knows (e.g. 'Q_OBJECT — marks the class as using the Qt meta-object system') and repeats section structures across class, entry-point, and free-function variants. It is above 2 because most content is actionable task guidance rather than padding, but below 4 due to the redundant explanations and repetition.

Actionability

Provides concrete, executable guidance — exact table column layouts, signature formatting rules, per-section content requirements, and pre-flight tool calls (Glob, AskUserQuestion). It is below 5 because the Usage Example section instructs the model to produce a snippet but does not itself show a concrete example, leaving a minor gap.

Workflow Clarity

Multi-step process is clearly sequenced: pre-flight documentation check with explicit AskUserQuestion branching, then input handling, then generation, then an internal quality-check checklist. Validation/feedback checkpoints are explicit (the pre-flight confirmation gates file overwrites), matching the anchor with explicit validation and error-recovery loops.

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and the entire body is a single ~390-line SKILL.md with all three document structures (class, entry-point, free-function) inlined rather than split into separate referenced files. Some header structure exists, but content that clearly belongs in separate files is inlined, matching the 'some structure but could be better organized' anchor; not 4 because nothing is split out and navigation is purely linear.

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions and a comprehensive enumeration of target file types ('Qt Widgets classes, Qt Quick backends, Qt/C++ modules, plain C++ utilities, structs, free-function headers, and entry points like main.cpp'). It is not below 5 because coverage is broad and concrete; not above because 5 is the scale maximum.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (generates standalone Markdown reference documentation) and 'when' ('Triggers on...' with concrete phrases and 'whenever C++ or header files are provided and documentation is needed'), plus scope and a negative trigger. Clearly a 5, not a 4, because both what and when are explicit and concrete.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases a user would actually say ('document this class', 'write docs for my C++', 'document main.cpp', 'C++ API docs', 'document my Qt app') plus file extensions (.h, .cpp) and synonyms. Not below 5 because keyword coverage is comprehensive.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche (Qt/C++ reference docs) with a negative trigger ('DO NOT use if the user asks for QDoc format output') that further reduces conflict risk. Minimal overlap with other skills.