Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an excellent lean, project-specific reference: dense with exact paths, names, and pinned contracts, well-sectioned, and free of fluff. Its main gap is the absence of an explicit multi-step workflow with validation feedback loops for batch/async operations, and no executable code snippets.
Suggestions
Add a short numbered workflow for adding a new MCP tool (register in mcp/server.rs → extend test_all_tools_are_registered → gate resources → verify with a timeout), including an explicit validate→fix→retry loop.
Include one copy-paste example per surface (e.g. a curl against /extract-async then GET /jobs/{job_id}, and an rmcp tool registration snippet) to lift actionability to fully executable.
Consider moving the full route table and env-var catalog into a references file linked from a condensed overview, keeping SKILL.md as a navigation hub.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and project-specific—route tables, constructor names, env vars, and pinned test contracts—with zero padding about concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, locatable guidance—exact file paths (api/router.rs, mcp/server.rs), handler names, ApiError constructors, and env var names—so an agent can act directly, but there is no copy-paste code/command block, keeping it below the fully-executable anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Critical Rules' sections act as checklists with validation emphasis (validate uploads, register tool and extend test_all_tools_are_registered), but there is no explicit sequenced workflow with validate→fix→retry feedback loops for the batch/async operations, so it sits at the 'checkpoints implicit' anchor rather than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clear sections with a well-signaled, one-level-deep 'Related Skills' pointer list (extraction-pipeline-patterns, chunking-embeddings, config-loading-precedence) and no nested references, fitting 'good structure; references mostly clear' though some route/env detail could be split out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |