Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured body that assumes Claude's competence and surfaces concrete functions and code. The main weakness is workflow clarity: routing changes lack explicit validation checkpoints despite the skill's own 'validate before extraction' rule.
Suggestions
Turn 'Adding New MIME Types' into a checked workflow: after step 3, add '4. Validate: call validate_mime_type() for the new MIME and confirm select_extractor_for_mime returns your extractor; only then proceed.'
Annotate the Key Functions table with file:line anchors (e.g. core/mime.rs:42) so the locations are directly actionable, not just file names.
Add a one-line 'Debugging a misroute' procedure (dump EXT_TO_MIME lookup → validate_mime_type → registry get_for_mime_type) so the trigger 'debugging why a file routes to the wrong extractor' has an executable workflow in the body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient: every section is a compact table, code block, or numbered list with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; tokens earn their place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance — a real Rust function signature and a numbered 'add a new MIME type' recipe — but the table's Location column points at files without line anchors and some steps (e.g. register_default_extractors) are named but not shown, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The detection flow is sequenced and the 'Adding New MIME Types' steps are listed, but a routing change is effectively a batch/destructive operation (files may route to the wrong extractor) and there are no validation checkpoints — e.g. 'validate_mime_type() before extraction' is stated as a rule but not embedded as a verify step in the workflow, which caps clarity at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a sub-50-line single-purpose skill with no bundle files, the body is a clear, well-organized overview with labeled sections and no nested references; structure is clean and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |