Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, high-signal constraints skill: every section carries project-specific knowledge Claude could not infer, with concrete code and config. The main improvements are removing the Critical Rules recap duplication, showing the required cfg_attr async_trait form, and adding a quick build/size verification step.
Suggestions
Drop the verbatim restatement of constraints 1–4 in the Critical Rules section (or drop the detailed sections and keep only the checklist) to remove duplicated tokens.
Show the two-arm cfg_attr async_trait pattern in a short code snippet, since rule 5 requires it but never demonstrates it.
Add a one-line verification step (e.g., the wasm-pack/build command and a check that the resulting .wasm stays under the jsDelivr 50 MB cap) so changes can be validated.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and entirely project-specific (feature-flag sets, jsDelivr 50 MB cap rationale, the Alef-generated warning) with no concepts Claude already knows. It falls short of the top anchor only because rules 1–4 in "Critical Rules" restate constraints 1–4 already detailed above — a small but real token duplication. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete throughout: exact TOML feature lists, file paths, the MAX_HTML_SIZE_BYTES constant, profile config, and code snippets for the trait impl and wasm-bindgen surface. Not fully copy-paste ready at the 5 level — the SyncExtractor snippet is a signature skeleton and rule 5's "two-arm cfg_attr async_trait form" is required but never shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a constraint reference rather than a sequential skill, each rule is unambiguous and organized by topic. It sits below 5 because there is no verification guidance (e.g., a build command or .wasm size check to confirm the constraints hold after a change), though nothing is incoherent enough to drop to 3. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single lean, well-sectioned file with no bundle files present and no content that warrants externalization — the appropriate structure for this scope, matching the well-organized single-file pattern. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |