Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tightly written, highly actionable research workflow with an explicit multi-step sequence, blocking gates, and a real audit feedback loop. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: it is one large inline document with no bundle files or one-level-deep navigable references.
Suggestions
Move the sector-measures table and the qualitative scorecard into a reference file (e.g. references/scorecard.md) and link to it, so SKILL.md stays an overview that pulls detail one level deep.
Add at least one concrete `python3 tools/financial_rigor.py` invocation with example arguments so the arithmetic step is copy-paste ready rather than implied.
Convert sibling-workflow and tool mentions into actual links or relative paths (e.g. [financial-data](../financial-data/SKILL.md)) to make navigation explicit rather than relying on code-span strings.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense but almost entirely task-specific instruction with little padding; it avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows (no 'what is a dividend') and every section earns its place, though a few prose lines (e.g. the ex-dividend aside) could be trimmed, keeping it at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, mostly-executable guidance: exact CLI command form, `python3 tools/financial_rigor.py` for arithmetic, a fixed 18-section report format, and audit commands; it stops at 4 because the financial_rigor.py and report_audit.py invocations omit argument details/examples and some steps are instructions rather than copy-paste code. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An explicit 8-step Execution Workflow plus a gated Classification/Verdict section and a Release Audit with a validate->fix->retry feedback loop ('A report that fails audit is a draft, not publishable research'; 'Fix failed items and repeat the audit'), with clear checkpoints including the INSUFFICIENT DATA gate and blocking gates. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is a single monolithic SKILL.md with no bundle files in references/scripts/assets and inline references to sibling skills/tools as code spans (e.g. `skills/financial-data.md`, `tools/report_audit.py`) rather than navigable links; structure is clear but content that could be split (the sector-measures table, scorecard) is inline, so it sits at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |