Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable funnel workflow with explicit validation checkpoints and mostly efficient prose; its main gap is that all detail lives inline in one long file with no bundle files to offload reference material.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient tables, templates, and checklists with little explanation of concepts Claude already knows; minor padding exists in the Codex adapter note and the bias-awareness table. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete thresholds (ROE > 15%, 负债率 < 60%), per-company analysis templates, and exact commands like 'python3 tools/report_audit.py extract' give mostly executable guidance with only minor placeholder gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-layer funnel is clearly sequenced with per-layer retention/elimination rules and an explicit data-sampling validation gate (extract -> verdict -> 准出/打回 feedback loop) before publication. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned single-file structure with clearly signaled references to external repo tools (tools/report_audit.py, skills/financial-data.md); no bundle files exist, and some inline detail (per-master templates) could be split out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |