Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable management-research workflow with concrete templates, thresholds, tool calls, and a clear nine-step sequence plus weighted scoring. It is somewhat padded with repeated investor aphorisms, but the core guidance is specific and usable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The workflow is mostly dense and actionable (table templates, thresholds, scoring rubrics), but the 设计理念 framing and repeated Buffett/Li Lu/Duan Yongping quotes across several steps add philosophical padding that could be trimmed without losing guidance. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, executable guidance: named data sources (股东信、电话会、采访), a concrete tool call (`tools/financial_rigor.py verify-valuation`), explicit thresholds (>80% 兑现率 = 优秀), a fixed output path, and fill-in table templates; minor gaps are that most instructions are templates rather than fully specified commands. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Nine clearly sequenced steps (第一步–第九步) with defined deliverables, a report structure, and a weighted scoring rubric; the adapter note supplies cross-check/validation rules, though there is no single explicit "validate data before saving" checkpoint. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, but the single SKILL.md is well-organized with clear step/section headers and the one external reference (`tools/financial_rigor.py`) is clearly signaled; content is appropriately self-contained for a workflow skill, with only minor inline bulk that could optionally be split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |