Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is a well-structured, actionable screening workflow with concrete thresholds and a complete output template. Its main weakness is workflow clarity: as a batch operation it lacks an explicit data-validation feedback loop, which the rubric caps at 3.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/retry step in the execution flow, e.g. after parallel data collection, verify each company's 7 metrics are complete and re-search any marked '数据不足' before final scoring.
Tighten or relocate the 'Codex adapter note' so the user-facing workflow begins with the skill's actual purpose rather than adapter boilerplate.
Specify concrete retrieval guidance (preferred data sources or example queries) so the data-collection step is fully executable rather than enumerated as a checklist.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and well-organized with compact tables, explicit thresholds, and minimal concept padding; the only minor over-explanation is the 'Codex adapter note' boilerplate, which keeps it just below the 'lean and every token earns its place' anchor at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete numeric thresholds for all 7 metrics, specific exemption conditions, enumerated per-company data fields, and a copy-ready output template give mostly executable guidance; minor gaps are the absence of exact retrieval commands or tool invocation specifics, which keeps it at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step sequence with mode branching and per-metric checking is present, but this is a batch operation over 10-30 companies with no explicit validate-and-retry feedback loop for missing/contradictory data; per the batch-operation cap, workflow clarity cannot exceed 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is organized into clear sections (design principles, metrics, exemptions, execution flow, caveats, limitations) with no nested references and no bundle files; structure is good and self-contained, just short of the 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level references' anchor at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |