Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sequenced, highly actionable workflow with explicit validation checkpoints, concrete CLI commands, and verbatim output templates. Its main weaknesses are minor redundancy across sections and a monolithic structure that could offload templates/tables into reference files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and purposeful with no padding of concepts Claude already knows, but the Improved/Unchanged/Weakened trio and the 5-dimension table recur near-verbatim across A4, A6, the report template, and 关键原则, and the three-mode dispatch is stated in 第一步 then re-expanded — minor trims are available. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides exact financial_rigor.py subcommands with full flags, fixed input-format specs, a verbatim 8-section output template, and a literal missing-baseline output block; the many unparameterized {…} placeholders across every command are the minor gap keeping it from copy-paste-ready 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced flow (mode-dispatch → A1–A6) with explicit validation checkpoints (cross-company stop, 结构缺失/不能编造, no-evidence → Unchanged, B2 mismatch guard, Mode C clean abort), feedback loops, and the fixed dimension table plus output template acting as checklists. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the content is one monolithic 220-line file with no one-level-deep references; headers organize it well and there are no nested reference chains, but the inlined full report template and dimension tables are content that progressive disclosure would split into reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |