Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a thorough, actionable workflow with strong sequencing and validation, but it is a long monolithic file with some non-essential framing that could be trimmed and no progressive file structure.
Suggestions
Trim the design-rationale section and the Keynes epigraph to the minimal rule set; the three change categories can be stated in one line each.
Move the dimension-judgment tables and the report output template into a reference file (e.g. references/drift-template.md) linked one level deep from the overview.
Collapse the repeated Improved/Unchanged/Weakened column text in the drift table since the verdict vocabulary is already fixed earlier in the body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly actionable tables and commands, but the design-rationale section and Keynes epigraph explain context Claude could infer, and the ~225-line length could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides executable commands (python3 tools/financial_rigor.py verify-valuation ... with full flags), concrete judgment tables, and a copy-paste-ready report template. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is clearly sequenced (mode selection → A1–A6 / B / C) with explicit validation checkpoints (numerical cross-validation, anti-mismatch pairing) and error-recovery handling for missing baselines. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single well-organized file with clear sections but no bundle files or one-level-deep references, and detailed tables/templates that could be split out remain inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |