Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no explanations of what skills or JSON are, and content is delivered as commands, schemas, and a table. It falls just short of anchor 5 because of minor padding: the opening line 'Wrap standalone skills into Tessl tiles to enable versioning, publishing, and evaluation' restates the description, and the 'Multiple Skills' section reprints an entire second full tile.json when showing only the multi-entry 'skills' map would suffice. It is above anchor 3 ('some unnecessary explanation') since nearly everything present is operational.

Actionability

Every step is copy-paste executable: 'tessl tile new <tile-name>', 'cp -r <skill-folder> <tile-name>/', 'tessl tile lint <tile-name>', a complete tile.json schema, and a lint-error table mapping each error to a concrete fix. This matches anchor 5 ('fully executable; copy-paste ready code or commands; specific examples cover the common cases') — the Common Lint Errors table explicitly covers the common failure cases.

Workflow Clarity

The Quick Start numbers the sequence (create → copy → update manifest → validate) with an explicit validation checkpoint ('tessl tile lint') and a feedback loop: 'If lint fails, see [Common Lint Errors] below, fix issues, then re-run lint.' This matches anchor 5 ('clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery'). The operation is non-destructive, so no batch/destruction cap applies.

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are clear and well-ordered (Prerequisites → Quick Start → Structure → Schema → Troubleshooting → Usage), and nothing is buried or nested — there are no broken or chained references. It does not reach anchor 5, which expects a lean overview with detail split out: the ~110-line body inlines a second full schema example ('Multiple Skills') plus the 'Using Tiles'/'Next Steps' sections, content that could live in a reference file. It is comfortably above anchor 3, since no large block 'should be' elsewhere — the lint table and schema are essential inline content.

Specificity

The description lists several concrete third-person actions — 'Creates tile manifest, validates directory structure, and ensures skill format compliance' — matching the anchor 'lists several specific actions; minor gaps in coverage'. It does not clearly reach anchor 5's 'comprehensive coverage': the action list omits parts of the workflow covered in the body (e.g., installing/publishing the tile), and 'ensures skill format compliance' is the vaguest of the three actions, so it sits above anchor 3 (only 1-2 actions) but below fully comprehensive.

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what ('Package a standalone skill into a Tessl tile for versioning, distribution, and evaluation' plus three concrete actions) and when ('Use when asked to... or before running evals on a skill not yet in a tile') with concrete trigger phrases, matching anchor 5 exactly. It is not anchor 4, where 'when' is present but less explicit or specific — here the 'when' clause enumerates five distinct trigger conditions.

Trigger Term Quality

The trigger list 'convert to tile', 'package this skill', 'create a tessl tile', 'wrap skill in tile', or 'before running evals on a skill not yet in a tile' provides comprehensive synonym coverage (convert/package/wrap/create) plus a proactive usage condition, matching anchor 5's 'comprehensive coverage of natural terms including synonyms'. Anchor 4 requires 'a few natural terms missing', but no common phrasing of this request is obviously absent.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Tessl tile packaging is a clear niche with distinct, product-specific triggers ('tessl tile', 'convert to tile'), giving minimal conflict risk with other skills, matching anchor 5. Unlike anchor 4 ('minor overlap risk with closely related skills'), no plausible sibling skill would trigger on these phrases.