Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean overview that delegates the detailed generative workflow to a single one-level-deep reference and provides concrete output formats and CLI commands. The main weakness is workflow clarity: the implied sequence lacks explicit validation checkpoints for the generated eval artifacts.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation step before running evals, e.g. 'Before running, verify every instruction in instructions.json is covered by at least one scenario and each criteria.json sums to 100' — this addresses the workflow_clarity gap.
Number the workflow steps (prerequisites -> generate -> validate -> run) so the sequence is explicit rather than implied by section order.
Trim minor padding such as 'It will guide you through the workflow of researching the tile and creating all the expected files in the correct formats' — the link and a one-line purpose suffice.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 55-line body is efficient with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but contains minor trimmable padding such as 'It will guide you through the workflow of researching the tile...' and 'Once ready, you can trigger the eval run on the tessl platform.' This matches anchor 4 rather than the every-token-earns-its-place standard of anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance throughout: an exact output tree with annotated filenames ('criteria.json # Scoring rubric (must sum to 100)'), sandbox constraints, and copy-paste CLI commands. The main generative workflow is delegated to the reference file, leaving minor gaps in the body itself, so it sits at anchor 4 rather than fully-executable anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The section order implies a sequence (prerequisites -> read reference guide -> produce output -> run evals), but validation checkpoints are implicit or absent — there is no step to verify instructions.json covers every instruction or that criteria sum to 100 before running. Anchor 3 ('steps listed but validation gaps') fits; it is not 4 because checkpoints are missing rather than minor. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear overview body with a single well-signaled, one-level-deep reference ('Read references/scenario-generation.md before starting') that exists in the bundle and contains no nested references. Content is appropriately split between overview and detailed workflow, matching the anchor-5 pattern exactly. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |