Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-organized with a clean task-routing table, but it relies on referenced files that are not bundled, leaving the actual generation guidance missing. The workflow is only implicitly sequenced.
Suggestions
Add a short numbered workflow (e.g. identify task → read reference template → extract content from repo → fill template) with an explicit validation/consistency check before output.
Either bundle the four referenced reference/*.md files or fix the path to references/ and confirm the paths resolve, so the routed guidance actually exists.
Include one concrete inline example (a filled-in template snippet or a sample resume entry) so the skill remains actionable even before opening the reference files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient body with no concept explanations; assumes Claude's competence and every section (task table, timing, principles) earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The task-identification table maps keywords to reference files but provides no concrete examples or templates inline, leaving the actionable detail deferred to files that are not present in the bundle. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A sequence is implied (identify task → select template → extract → format output) but steps are not explicitly numbered with checkpoints; only Step 0 is named. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Four references are clearly signaled one level deep in the table, but the referenced directory is written as reference/ while the bundle convention is references/, and none of those bundle files exist in the skill folder. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |