Content
50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and gives useful generation conventions, but it never provides a complete, copy-paste Excalidraw JSON example or skeleton, and lacks an explicit validation step for the parseable JSON it must produce. Splitting the detailed conventions into a reference file would improve progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Include one complete minimal .excalidraw JSON example (with a rectangle + text + arrow element) so the output is copy-paste executable rather than described field-by-field.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint in the workflow (e.g. 'verify JSON parses and every element id is unique before outputting') with a fix-and-retry loop.
Move the detailed element-generation conventions and file-structure requirements into a references/ file (e.g. ELEMENTS.md) referenced one level deep from SKILL.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and instructional without over-explaining Excalidraw basics, but the elaborate input-format template and soft '注意事项' advice add padding that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete field names and conventions (rectangle, backgroundColor, strokeWidth, groupIds, points, type, version) but never assembles them into a complete executable JSON or element example, leaving key execution details missing. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step generation process and two-part output format are clearly sequenced, but there is no validate-then-fix checkpoint despite requiring parseable JSON, so validation remains implicit. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned single file with no nested-reference problem, but all detail (element conventions, file-structure requirements, color rules) is inlined rather than split into reference files, and no bundle references exist. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |