Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, instruction-only design guide with concrete, actionable specifics (named fonts, contrast ratios, CSS features) and a coherent conceptual sequence. Its main weaknesses are mild verbosity from restating well-known design/accessibility concepts and the absence of explicit workflow checkpoints or illustrative code.
Suggestions
Trim explanations of concepts Claude already knows (e.g. the WCAG 可感知/可操作/可理解/健壮 breakdown and the general benefits of whitespace) to lift conciseness toward a 5.
Add one or two short, copy-pasteable code snippets (e.g. a CSS-variables theme block and a prefers-reduced-motion media query) to move actionability from mostly-executable to fully executable.
Make the design workflow explicit with numbered steps and a verification checkpoint (e.g. "4. 自检：对比度 ≥ 4.5:1？动效有 reduced-motion 分支？") to raise workflow_clarity above 3.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient directive guidance, but re-explains concepts Claude already knows — e.g. "留白能引导视线、建立层次、减轻视觉疲劳" and the WCAG 可感知/可操作/可理解/健壮 principles — which is padding; not verbose enough for a 2, but not lean enough for a 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is concrete and specific: named fonts to avoid (Inter、Roboto、Arial、思源黑体、Space Grotesk), a numeric contrast target (≥ 4.5:1 WCAG AA), and specific CSS hooks (prefers-reduced-motion、:focus-visible、CSS 变量). It lacks complete code examples, keeping it below 5, but is clearly actionable rather than abstract. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A loose sequence is present ("动手写代码前，先理解上下文并选定...美学方向" → then implement), but it has no explicit checkpoints or validation/feedback loops; this is a creative skill so the destructive-batch cap does not apply, yet checkpoints are still only implicit, matching a 3 rather than a 4. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is organized into clear topical sections (设计思维、前端美学指南 with subsections、禁忌、可访问性、总结) with no nested or buried references and no bundle files to mis-link; at ~88 lines it is slightly long for a single file, which keeps it just below a 5, but structure is good and placement is appropriate. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |