Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized router-style skill body that is concise and clearly sequenced, but its actionability and progressive disclosure are undermined because every referenced reference/*.md file is missing from the bundle.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced reference/*.md files (outline-review-*, structure-imitate-*, polish-*, references.md, merge.md, etc.) in the skill bundle so the routing tables resolve to real content.
Add a brief fallback in Step 3 for when a reference file is unavailable, so execution is not blocked by a missing delegate.
Confirm the directory name: the body links to reference/ (singular) while skills typically bundle under references/ — align the paths so links resolve.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean router of tables mapping tasks to files plus terse notes; it does not explain concepts Claude already knows and every line earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Routing tables and the 注意事项 (Word spacing rules, de-AI phrases to avoid) are concrete, but the actual per-task instructions are delegated to reference/ files that are not present in the bundle, and Step 3 ('按其中 Role/Task/Constraints/Output Format 执行') stays abstract — incomplete rather than copy-paste ready. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Step 1 (identify task) → Step 2 (collect input, with the gating checkpoint '收齐后再执行') → Step 3 (execute) sequence; this is a non-destructive writing skill so the absence of error-recovery loops does not cap it at 2. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are well-signaled and one level deep via clean task→file tables, but the referenced reference/*.md files do not exist in the skill bundle, so the disclosure cannot actually resolve to content — structure is good yet navigation is broken. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |