Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-sequenced, highly actionable instruction skill with strong workflow checkpoints, undermined only by progressive-disclosure links that point to non-existent bundle files.
Suggestions
Add the missing reference/ bundle files (explore.md, project-types.md, chapters-01-04.md, chapters-05-09.md, quality.md) so the signaled links resolve.
Until those files exist, inline the essential content from each reference into SKILL.md or remove the broken links.
Trim motivational asides in Phase 3 (e.g., "比没有文档更糟") to recover token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean with tight tables and bullets and no basic-concept padding, but a few motivational asides ("比没有文档更糟", "是新人最容易卡住的地方") could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete file names, fixed numbering convention, 300–600 line targets, citation format (src/core/channel.cpp:120-135), and the ⚠️ 未验证 marker give copy-ready guidance; code is not required for this instruction-only skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phase 1→4 sequence with explicit checkpoints: read-before-paste verification, ask-before-overwrite safety for existing docs, and a Phase 4 self-check checklist plus a four-item report-back to the user. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-structured with clearly signaled one-level references, but the referenced files (reference/explore.md, project-types.md, chapters-01-04.md, chapters-05-09.md, quality.md) do not exist in the bundle, so navigation is broken. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |