Content
62%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured with a clear phased workflow and explicit validation, but it suffers from a broken reference to a missing reference.md and some redundancy between the exploration bullets and the prompt template. Tightening the overlap and providing the referenced templates would raise quality.
Suggestions
Create the missing reference.md (or remove the dangling link) so the promised document templates are actually available — the broken reference currently undermines both actionability and progressive disclosure.
Deduplicate Phase 1: either keep the exploration-target bullet list or the '提示词参考' prompt block, not both, since they cover the same ground.
Trim the Phase 4 checklist items that merely restate the Phase 2 ordering rule, keeping only the genuine post-generation verification checks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the Phase 1 bullet list of exploration targets and the immediately following '提示词参考' code block substantially overlap, and the Phase 4 checklist partly repeats earlier ordering guidance — it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete specifics (nine named filenames, a fixed per-doc structure, explicit writing techniques and taboos), but the detailed templates that would make guidance fully copy-paste ready are deferred to reference.md, which does not exist, leaving a gap between instruction and execution. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-phase sequence (explore → order → write → verify) with an explicit post-generation validation checklist in Phase 4, plus a reinforced ordering constraint (language-concepts doc before code walkthrough) and a skip/renumber rule, matching the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps and checklists' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned and signals an external reference ('详细模板见 [reference.md](reference.md)'), but that file is absent — no references/ directory or reference.md exists — so the one-level-deep reference is broken and the detailed template content it promises is unavailable. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |