Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, reasonably concise instruction skill with a clear three-step workflow, but it lacks a worked conversion example and an explicit output-verification step, which cap actionability and workflow clarity at 2.
Suggestions
Add one worked example showing a full Skill→Prompt conversion (input SKILL.md → output Prompt) and one Prompt→Skill conversion to make the guidance copy-paste ready.
Insert an explicit verification checkpoint in Step 3 (e.g., 'Check that no core logic, steps, or constraints were dropped before returning the result') to satisfy the zero-loss rule concretely.
Trim the '使用时机' section or the overlapping '注意事项' bullets to remove redundancy with the description and Step 2.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean and free of concept-explanation fluff, but the '使用时机' section restates triggers already in the description and several '注意事项' bullets overlap with rules shown in Step 2 and the format example, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete field-to-field mapping rules ('将 name、description 融入 # Role 和 # Task'), but for an instruction-only skill the copy-paste-ready equivalent — a worked input→output example — is missing, leaving the guidance incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Step 1/2/3 sequence is clear, but there is no explicit validation or verify-output checkpoint (the '信息零丢失' rule is only implicit), matching the 'checkpoints missing or implicit' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, needs no external references, and is organized into clear sections (使用时机, Step 1/2/3, 注意事项), satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |