Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable installer workflow with explicit validation checkpoints and a fix-feedback loop, scoring high on workflow clarity and actionability; the main improvement would be moving the bulky skill catalog into a reference file for better progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient — concrete commands, tabular skill listings, and purposeful notes — with only minor explanatory prose that could be trimmed; it avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, fitting the 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' anchor above the padded 3. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste bash commands (git clone, cp -r, mkdir -p, grep) and exact AskUserQuestion templates with defined variables ($ECC_ROOT, $TARGET); mostly executable with minor gaps where steps rely on Claude's judgment (e.g., 'suggest removing irrelevant sections'), so just below the fully copy-paste-ready 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0–6 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation in Step 4 (4a file existence, 4b path references, 4c cross-references, 4d issue reporting) and a feedback loop where Step 5 fixes path issues found in Step 4, satisfying the 'explicit validation steps with feedback loops' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections (何时激活, 先决条件, 步骤 0–6, 故障排除) with no nested references and appropriate single-file structure, but the large inline tables of all 27 skills could be split into a reference file, leaving it just below the ideal 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |