Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a well-sequenced, validated workflow, but it is monolithic and verbose — the inline 27-skill catalog and repeated option blocks inflate token usage. Splitting the catalog and templates into a reference file would improve both conciseness and progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Move the full 27-skill catalog tables into a referenced file (e.g. SKILLS.md) and keep only the category-selection summary inline.
Trim repeated AskUserQuestion option blocks to a single reusable template, or link out to a reference for the verbose option lists.
Signal the reference explicitly (e.g. 'See references/SKILLS.md for the full skill list') so navigation is one level deep.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with concrete commands and templates, but the body inlines full 27-skill catalog tables and repeated AskUserQuestion option blocks that pad the context; it could be tightened or deferred. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable bash commands (git clone, cp -r, mkdir -p, grep -rn) and concrete AskUserQuestion templates with exact options — copy-paste ready and specific. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Steps 0–6 sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (Step 4a–4d) covering file existence, path references, cross-references, and issue reporting, plus feedback loops that fix detected path problems in Step 5. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle/reference files exist and the skill is monolithic: the full skill catalog and all option templates are inline rather than split into clearly signaled one-level-deep references. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |