Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured instruction-only skill with a clear workflow and validation checkpoints. The main gap is actionability: it would benefit from concrete examples or templates rather than checklists alone.
Suggestions
Add a short example or template for at least one asset type (e.g., a sample Use-of-funds table layout or a one-line company description) to move from checklist to copy-paste-ready guidance.
Replace abstract directives like '带着明确的逻辑起草资产' with a concrete drafting heuristic or required elements list.
Show one concrete 'Source of Truth' example (e.g., a small metrics/assumptions table) so the cross-check step is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean bullet-and-list structure with no explaining of concepts Claude already knows; every line carries actionable guidance and respects the token budget. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete 12-slide deck order and specific checklist items, but offers no example outputs/templates and includes some abstract directives like '带着明确的逻辑起草资产', leaving key details implicit. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step core workflow with an explicit 'stop and resolve contradictions before drafting' checkpoint and a pre-delivery Quality Gate verification, satisfying the validation-checkpoint anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single well-organized file with clearly signaled sections and no nested references; no bundle files exist, and the content is appropriately inline for a cohesive overview guide. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |