Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an excellent lean, executable PostgreSQL quick-reference with copy-paste SQL and well-organized sections that assume Claude's competence. Its only gap is the absence of validation/feedback loops, which the rubric specifically expects for database operations and which caps workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add a brief validate-then-retry loop for the destructive/batch patterns (e.g. after the queue-processing and ALTER SYSTEM config template, note how to verify the change took effect and roll back if needed).
For the anti-pattern detection section, add a short follow-up step indicating what to do once a missing-FK-index or slow query is found (create the index / EXPLAIN ANALYZE) to close the loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — dense tables, executable snippets, and brief inline comments (e.g. "等值列在前，范围列在后") — with no padding explaining what PostgreSQL is or basic concepts, so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready SQL throughout (CREATE INDEX variants, INSERT...ON CONFLICT, FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED, ALTER SYSTEM, anti-pattern detection queries), matching the "fully executable code/commands" anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Content is well-organized by category with a clear 触发时机 section, but as a reference catalog it has no multi-step sequencing or validation/feedback loops; the rubric explicitly flags database operations as needing such loops, capping this at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ absent) and none are needed; the single self-contained file is well-organized into clear sections (索引速查表, 数据类型, 常用模式, 反模式检测, 配置模板) with a 相关 navigation block and no nested references, fitting a well-organized quick-reference. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |