Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable verification workflow with executable commands, explicit stop-and-fix checkpoints, and a clear report template. Its only weakness is minor verbosity from a few obvious comments and redundant report fields.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean with direct bash commands and brief bullets, but a few comments restate the obvious (e.g. '# 检查项目是否能成功构建' before `npm run build`) and the report-field list repeats what the test command already prints, so it could be tightened further rather than earning the lean/efficient anchor at 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Each phase ships concrete, copy-paste-ready commands (`npm run build`, `npx tsc --noEmit`, `npm run lint`, `npm run test -- --coverage`, grep scans, `git diff --stat`) with JS/TS and Python variants plus a filled-in report template, matching the fully-executable anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Six phases are clearly sequenced (阶段 1–6) with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops — '如果构建失败，请停止并在继续之前进行修复' and '在继续之前修复关键错误' — plus a final pass/fail report, satisfying the clear-sequence-with-validation anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the single self-contained SKILL.md is organized into well-signaled sections (何时使用, 验证阶段, 输出格式, 持续模式, 与钩子集成) with no nested references, which per the simple-skills note earns a 3 for a well-organized single-file skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |