vercel-debug
Investigate Vercel deployment errors using Vercel CLI. Use when user shares a Vercel deployment error, build failure, or deployment URL that needs debugging.
91
88%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Quality
Discovery
89%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-structured skill description with strong trigger terms and clear 'Use when' guidance that makes it easy for Claude to select appropriately. The main weakness is the lack of specific concrete actions beyond the general 'Investigate' verb, which could be expanded to better communicate the skill's full capabilities.
Suggestions
Expand the capabilities section with specific actions like 'analyze build logs, check deployment configuration, inspect environment variables, review function errors'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Vercel deployment errors) and the tool (Vercel CLI), but only describes one general action 'Investigate' rather than listing multiple specific concrete actions like 'analyze build logs, check environment variables, inspect deployment configuration'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Investigate Vercel deployment errors using Vercel CLI') and when ('Use when user shares a Vercel deployment error, build failure, or deployment URL that needs debugging') with explicit trigger guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural keywords users would say: 'Vercel deployment error', 'build failure', 'deployment URL', 'debugging'. These are terms users naturally use when encountering Vercel issues. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Very specific niche targeting Vercel-specific deployment issues. The combination of 'Vercel', 'deployment errors', 'build failure', and 'Vercel CLI' creates distinct triggers unlikely to conflict with general debugging or other deployment platform skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted debugging skill that is concise, actionable, and appropriately scoped. The workflow progresses logically from authentication through log inspection. The main gap is the lack of a verification step after applying fixes from the common errors table.
Suggestions
Add a step 6 for verification: after applying a fix, re-run `vercel inspect` or trigger a new deployment to confirm the issue is resolved
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line serves a purpose. No explanation of what Vercel is or how deployments work. Commands are direct with minimal commentary. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | All commands are copy-paste ready with proper flags and placeholders. The common errors table provides specific fixes, not vague suggestions. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced for the debugging workflow, but lacks explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops for error recovery after applying fixes. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a focused debugging skill under 50 lines, the content is well-organized with clear sections. No need for external references given the scope. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- yahsan2/static-admin
- Commit
f734087
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.