Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured orchestrator body that gives concrete commands, clear guardrails, and explicit completion criteria while deferring detail to one-level-deep references. The main improvements are naming the provider reference files explicitly and consolidating the duplicated email.md read triggers.
Suggestions
Name the provider reference files explicitly (e.g., "Read `references/fly.md` or `references/aws.md` for the selected provider") so navigation does not depend on inference.
Consolidate the two `references/email.md` read triggers into a single conditional instruction to remove the redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~25-line body is lean and dense with no concept explanations Claude already knows (e.g., "Use the repository's installed `@yc-software/qm` dependency through `npm exec qm -- <command>`"). Not 5: `references/email.md` is pointed to twice with different triggers ("before collecting email secrets" and "once the operator has chosen the broker") — a redundancy that could be consolidated. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands (`npm exec qm -- <command>`, `qm admin-login`), a concrete config key (`modelProvider`), named broker options, and a concrete acceptance criterion ("A web response without a generated sidebar title is not a completed deployment"). Not 5: no copy-paste-ready example command for the main flow, which is delegated to `deployment.md`. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence is present (`deployment.md` as authoritative workflow → selected provider reference → collect model key and sign-in "in the same pass" → conditional email/Slack references → acceptance checks) with explicit checkpoints ("Do not stop at infrastructure health: complete the acceptance checks"). Not 5: steps are not enumerated in the body and the fix/retry feedback loop lives in the delegated file rather than here. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | All references are one level deep with well-signaled conditional read triggers ("Read `references/slack.md` only when Slack is requested"), and the referenced files (email.md, slack.md) exist in the bundle. Not 5: "Read only the selected provider reference" never names `references/fly.md`, `aws.md`, or `porter.md`, leaving a minor navigation gap the reader must infer. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |