Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and action-oriented with a clear completion gate, and it uses well-signaled one-level references for provider/email/Slack detail. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: the authoritative workflow reference is broken/external and there is no section structure.
Suggestions
Resolve the '../../../deployment.md' reference — either bundle it under references/ and point to it, or inline the authoritative workflow steps so the skill is self-contained.
Add section headers (e.g., '## Prerequisites', '## Sign-in and model provider', '## Completion') to make the orchestration scannable.
Surface at least one concrete acceptance-check command so the completion gate is executable rather than only described.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean three-paragraph body that assumes Claude's competence, gives only non-obvious guidance, and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows; every sentence earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete commands ('npm exec qm -- <command>', 'qm admin-login') and specifics ('modelProvider', sidebar-title completion check), though the bulk of executable steps are delegated to deployment.md and provider references. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences key decisions (collect base model key and sign-in in the same pass; read email.md after choosing the broker) and gates completion on acceptance checks plus the sidebar-title check, with only minor validation gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are one-level-deep and conditionally signaled ('Read references/slack.md only when Slack is requested'), but the primary authoritative reference '../../../deployment.md' does not exist as a bundle file and the body lacks section headers, leaving organization partial. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |