Content
83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured overview that delegates detail to real one-level-deep references and specifies concrete qm CLI commands plus an automated release gate. Its main limitation is that the full deployment sequence and error-recovery detail live in deployment.md rather than inline.
Suggestions
Inline a short, numbered high-level deployment sequence so the core workflow is visible without opening deployment.md.
Add an explicit validate -> fix -> retry loop for the qm check --live gate so error recovery is visible in the skill body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every sentence drives an action and earns its place in the context window. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands ('npm exec qm -- <command>', 'qm check --live', 'qm admin-login') with minor gaps, but the bulk of the deployment step sequence is delegated to deployment.md rather than given inline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence with explicit validation checkpoints is present (qm check --live as automated release gate plus manual sign-in and web acceptance check), though detailed error-recovery feedback loops live in the external deployment.md. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references (deployment.md and a selectable set of real provider reference files), including explicit selective-loading guidance ('Read only the selected provider reference', 'Read references/slack.md only when Slack is requested'). | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |