Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, actionable runbook: executable commands, an explicit sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints, and clean structure with appropriately signaled references. The only minor gap is a little rationale prose that could be tightened without losing clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence; the explanatory prose (why a net diff fails, why authorship is scanned) earns its place because it covers non-obvious domain-specific failure modes. Not a 5 because a few passages of rationale could be trimmed further. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready executable commands throughout — git status --porcelain, git fetch/switch -c/cherry-pick, git log -p --no-renames, the four grep scans, and gh pr create with explicit flags — covering the common cases fully. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced multi-step process (identify target, decide upstream-worthiness, clean tree/branch, scrub with four checks, push, handle leaks) with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops — 'this must print nothing', 'On any hit, stop and rebuild', 'Run all four checks ... and again after any amend or rebase', and the REFUSING guard on an empty term list. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single cohesive workflow file, well-organized into labeled sections, with the one external reference (deploy/layers/README.md) clearly signaled and one level deep; no nested or buried references, and no bundle files are needed. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |