Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, concise, and actionable sync workflow with concrete translation mappings and a final validation checklist. The main gaps are the lack of an explicit re-validate-on-failure feedback loop and a pseudo rather than executable diff step.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop after Step 4: if any consistency check fails, return to Step 3 to fix and re-run the Step 4 checks until all pass.
Replace or supplement the pseudo 'Read README.md' block with an executable diff command (e.g., a grep/diff snippet counting '###' headers) so the core detection step is copy-paste ready.
Consider moving the 11-row EN→JA translation table into a references file (e.g., references/translation_table.md) and linking to it from the body to improve navigation and token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, table-driven content that assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows. Not a 5 because the example diff-report block and the Overview workflow list partly echo the detailed Steps, offering minor trim opportunities; not a 3 because there is no real padding or over-explanation. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance: an 11-row EN→JA translation table, a check-item table, and explicit translation policy rules. Not a 5 because the only code block is pseudo `Read README.md` rather than executable diff logic, leaving a minor gap; not a 3 because the structured guidance is specific and actionable for an instruction-only skill. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four clearly sequenced steps with a Step 4 validation checklist (4 items), so validation is present and the destructive/batch cap does not apply. Not a 5 because there is no explicit fix→re-validate feedback loop for the batch two-file edit; not a 3 because checkpoints are present rather than missing. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into Overview, When to Use, Instructions (Steps), and Guidelines with no nested references; self-contained with no bundle files, which is appropriate here. Not a 5 because at ~105 lines the sizeable translation table is inlined where a separate reference file could aid navigation; not a 3 because structure is clean and clearly signaled. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |