Advance a flow workspace agentically — validate the definition, regenerate the board, take the single highest-leverage move from the deterministic run card (overdue decision, broken contract, blocked item, missing exit evidence, ready-to-pull, over-WIP, aging, or intake), run that step under its contract, verify the exit evidence with something independent, and record the transition. Use to run a cycle, work the flow on a cadence, drive an item to its next decision, or operate the loop headlessly. Loop 1 of the flow-driven family.
94%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Passed
No findings from the security scan
One move executed well: the right item advanced through the right step under its contract, its exit evidence produced and independently verified, its state recorded, and the next decision made visible to the human who owns it. One cycle, one move — the power is in repetition, not in scope.
mode:pair (default) — ask when the run card is ambiguous; a human is present.mode:loop — headless. No blocking questions. When a cycle reaches a human decision,
write the brief, set next_decision, log it, and end reporting DECISION-PENDING <slug>.mode:brief <slug> — skip selection; prepare the decision brief for this item.flow_lint.py <ws>. GATE: violations mean the definition of workflow is
lying to you — fixing them is this cycle's move, and nothing else is.flow_board.py <ws> — regenerate before reading. Never steer from memory,
a stale board, or a summary of a board.flow_next.py <ws> prints the rule that fired, why, the item, the
step's full run contract, the exit evidence to produce, the candidate next edges, and
what to record. Exit code 4 means the top move is a human decision.flow-driven-evolve, not a licence to pick your favourite item.max_iterations. When the escalation condition fires, stop and escalate
— that is the contract being satisfied, not a failure.verify_with in a context independent of the run, with a sceptic's brief.
Record its findings — including "none, and here is what I examined". If the step declares
no verification and sits at rung 3+, verify anyway and open an improvement card.## Notes.
Entering a decision point without a dated Decision-log entry is forbidden — prepare the
brief instead and set next_decision with a date and a name.step, step_entered, holder, evidence_exits_met, and add a dated
row to the item's ## Exit evidence log. Re-run flow_board.py (it appends the
transition). Append one line to reviews/loop-log.md. Capture at most one learning.CYCLE-COMPLETE <rule> <slug> or DECISION-PENDING <slug>, plus the one
thing the next cycle should know.When the move is a human decision, the deliverable is a brief on the item (or in reviews/):
what you can rely on (evidence, with its receipts) · what is still open (and what it
would cost to close) · evidence vs opinion, labelled · options with trade-offs,
including doing nothing · a recommendation with its reasoning · who decides and by
when. Then stop. Agents prepare decisions; they do not make them, and a brief that argues
one option without the alternatives is advocacy wearing a brief's clothes.
improvements/, learnings/, or the
loop log — never into this cycle's scope.workflow.md or a step contract during a run cycle, however obvious the fix.skills/flow-driven/references/loop-engineering.md — the six beats and why the leverage
table is ordered the way it is.skills/flow-driven/references/step-contracts.md — running a step, escalation, verification.skills/flow-driven/references/workflow-definition.md — what to record and where.flow-driven-evolve — where a wrong run card, a missing check, or a recurring escalation goes.yyeret/portfolio-pdlc
cb337f8
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.