Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, appropriately concise process skill with concrete agent prompts and clear sequencing. Its main defect is bundling: three links to REFERENCE.md point at a file absent from the skill bundle, and the outward-facing gh-issue step lacks any verification checkpoint.
Suggestions
Ship REFERENCE.md in the bundle (or inline the four dependency categories and the issue template into SKILL.md) — the workflow cannot be executed as bundled because every reference to [REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md) is a broken link.
Add a lightweight validation checkpoint before or after 'gh issue create' (e.g., render the RFC body for correctness of cluster/dependency-category fields, or verify the returned URL), since creating a public GitHub issue is an outward-facing, hard-to-reverse action.
Trim emphasis-only phrases (e.g., 'The friction you encounter IS the signal') and fold step headings 3 and 6 into their preceding sections to tighten token usage.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and instructional with only minor trimmable padding — the one-line Ousterhout definition grounds the terminology rather than re-teaching it, and 'The friction you encounter IS the signal' is a slight flourish. Not 5 because a few phrases add emphasis rather than information. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete executable guidance: 'Use the Agent tool with subagent_type=Explore', verbatim sub-agent prompts ('Minimize the interface — aim for 1-3 entry points max'), a numbered output format per agent, and 'gh issue create'. Not 5 because key details — 'the four categories' and the issue template — are deferred to REFERENCE.md, which is not present in the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 7-step process with user-decision checkpoints at steps 2/3 ('Which of these would you like to explore?') and 6. Not 5 because there is no validation around the final outward-facing step — 'Do NOT ask the user to review before creating — just create it' skips any verification of the issue content or of command success. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References to [REFERENCE.md](REFERENCE.md) are clearly signaled and one level deep, but the bundle contains no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories — the referenced file does not exist, so navigation to the dependency categories and the RFC template is broken. Clearly signaled structure, but a dangling reference to a missing file cannot count as good organization. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |