Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly actionable skill body: the workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation loops, the audit script reference is real and well-signaled, and the guidance is concrete. The main weakness is cross-section repetition of the same guidance (SEO, RTL, error handling) that inflates token cost without adding information.
Suggestions
Consolidate SEO/metadata, RTL, and error-handling guidance each into a single section — they currently appear 3-4 times across Core Capabilities, the workflow, Guardrails, Architecture Guidance, and Failure Modes (conciseness).
Add one short concrete example of provider wiring and locale file/key structure (e.g., a minimal i18next init snippet and en-US.json/zh-CN.json pair) to make the setup step copy-paste ready (actionability).
The Validation Checklist and Failure Modes sections largely restate workflow steps 6-8; fold their unique items into the workflow and delete the rest (conciseness).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is terse, imperative bullets with no concept-teaching padding ('Wire the provider at the app root', 'Never expose raw `error.message` to UI'). Not 5 because of genuine redundancy: SEO/metadata localization is restated ~4 times (Core Capabilities, step 2, Architecture Guidance, Failure Modes), RTL three times, and Guardrails repeats step 6's error-handling rules. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides executable commands that match the real bundle — 'python scripts/i18n_audit.py --src <src-root> --locale ...' (verified against scripts/i18n_audit.py), ready-to-run rg regex patterns, the plural pattern "t('key', { count })` + `_one/_other", and 'python -m json.tool <file>'. Not 5 because there is no concrete provider-wiring or locale-file/key-structure example for the setup step. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step Audit -> Fix -> Validate workflow is clearly sequenced with an explicit validation feedback loop ('Re-run the audit until missing/parity issues are zero', JSON validation via json.tool, and updating tests) and a blocking rule ('Treat missing keys/parity gaps as blockers'). Matches the anchor requiring explicit validation steps and error-recovery loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Scored against the actual bundle: one script (scripts/i18n_audit.py) exists, is referenced one level deep, is used in workflow step 3 and listed again under a Resources section with a one-line description. The body is a well-sectioned overview with no oversized inline blocks that should be split out. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |