CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

playwright-core

Battle-tested Playwright patterns for E2E, API, component, visual, accessibility, and security testing. Covers locators, assertions, fixtures, network mocking, auth flows, debugging, and framework recipes for React, Next.js, Vue, and Angular. TypeScript and JavaScript.

62

Quality

73%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/playwright/core/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-organized, concise navigation hub with concrete golden rules, but it ships no executable code in the body and links to 46 guide files that are missing from the bundle.

Suggestions

Provide the referenced guides (e.g. locators.md, assertions-and-waiting.md) in a references/ directory so the indexed links resolve; otherwise the progressive-disclosure structure is unfulfilled.

Add a short Quick Start block with one copy-paste-ready Playwright snippet so the body itself is actionable, not only an index.

Add a brief decision/checkout workflow (e.g. 'pick a guide → write test → run with traces on-first-retry → consult debugging.md on failure') to give the multi-step test-writing process explicit sequence and validation.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean and scannable: ten one-line Golden Rules and category tables, with no re-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; nearly every token earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

The Golden Rules give concrete directives (e.g. 'Never page.waitForTimeout() — use expect(locator).toBeVisible()', 'Retries: 2 in CI, 0 locally') but the body contains no executable code blocks or copy-paste-ready commands, falling short of the level-3 anchor.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Navigation is organized by category, but the body is a reference index rather than a sequenced workflow, and there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops for the destructive/fragile operations (auth, network mocking) it covers.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The structure is textbook progressive disclosure — a concise overview with one-level-deep, well-signaled references — but none of the 46 referenced .md files actually exist in a references/ bundle, so the promised references resolve to nothing.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

82%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A specific, well-scoped description with strong trigger-term coverage, weakened only by the absence of an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming natural triggers, e.g. 'Use when writing or debugging Playwright E2E/API/component tests, or when the user mentions Playwright, browser automation, or flaky tests.'

Drop the marketing filler 'Battle-tested' to keep the description factual and token-efficient.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists many concrete capabilities — 'locators, assertions, fixtures, network mocking, auth flows, debugging' plus framework recipes for React, Next.js, Vue, and Angular — matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

It clearly answers 'what' but has no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which the guidelines say caps completeness at 2.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Strong coverage of natural terms a user would say (Playwright, E2E, API testing, fixtures, network mocking, React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, TypeScript/JavaScript); the only soft spot is the buzzword 'Battle-tested'.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped tightly to Playwright across named testing surfaces and frameworks, giving it a clear niche unlikely to trigger for unrelated testing skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 49 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
zebbern/claude-code-guide
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.