Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, largely actionable specification with a clear workflow, real one-level-deep references, and a strong validation checklist. The main weakness is redundancy: meta sections and duplicated template/typography content inflate the body against the very contracts it points to.
Suggestions
Remove the meta 'Reference Source' section and collapse the duplicated default-output statements in 'Supported Outputs' into a single line.
Replace the two full inline structure templates with brief per-style summaries (3-4 bullets each), pointing to references/structure_contract.md for the layouts — the body currently duplicates the contract's content.
Trim the Typography Strategy tables to font names per role (heading/body/labels) and defer exact pairing rules to references/style_contract.md, which already documents the extracted font system.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly an efficient spec, but padded/duplicative sections remain: the meta "Reference Source" block ("Type: Uploaded artifact (PDF)" / "Reference File Type: PDF"), "Supported Outputs" restating "Default output: PDF" twice, and full inline structure templates and typography tables that duplicate material the body itself defers to the contracts. Anchor 3, not 4, because multiple sections could be trimmed or pushed to references. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: exact fonts (KaiTi, SimSun, Times New Roman), exact caption formats ("图 N" / "Figure N", "数据来源：xxx"), a style-selection decision table, and explicit numbering conventions. Absence of code is acceptable for an instruction-only skill; minor gap: no guidance on the tooling for actually producing the PDF. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence ending in "Review for completeness" plus an explicit 11-item "Key Quality Checks" checklist as a validation checkpoint. Not 5: no fix-and-retry feedback loop for failed checks, though nothing here triggers the destructive/batch cap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Two real, substantive references ([references/style_contract.md] and [references/structure_contract.md]), one level deep, clearly signaled and described ("for detailed style rules", "for full details"). Slight deduction: the body inlines full structure templates and typography detail that overlap the referenced contracts. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |