vc-industry-research

Generate professional primary market / venture capital industry research reports, including sector deep-dives, investment memos, and market analysis. Produces detailed PDF reports covering TMT, consumer, healthcare, and industrials. Triggered by requests to analyze an industry, create a market report, write a sector deep-dive, or generate any PE/VC-style research document in Chinese or English.

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/vc-industry-research/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

57%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured with genuinely specialized PE/VC formatting guidance and a sound one-level-deep reference layout, but it is held back by duplicated inline detail, a missing document-generation mechanism, and the absence of an explicit error-recovery feedback loop in the workflow.

Suggestions

Delegate the full ASCII cover-page layouts and typography tables to the reference contracts and keep only a brief summary inline, tightening conciseness and removing duplication with structure_contract.md / style_contract.md.

Add a concrete, executable step for producing the PDF/DOCX/PPTX (e.g., a named library or script command), since the workflow currently says 'Generate the report' without specifying how.

Turn the end-of-process checklist into an explicit validate→fix→re-validate loop (e.g., 'If any Key Quality Check fails, fix and re-run the checklist before finalizing') to add a feedback loop for the document-production process.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Mostly efficient and free of basic-concept padding, but the body reproduces substantial detail (ASCII cover-page layouts under 'Structure Templates' and the full 'Typography Strategy' tables) that is also spelled out in the reference files, so it could be tightened.	2 / 3
Actionability	Formatting guidance is concrete and copy-paste-ready (named fonts, '图 N'/'表 N' numbering, citation formats), but the actual document-generation mechanism is missing — no library, command, or code for producing the PDF/DOCX/PPTX outputs is given, leaving a key detail incomplete.	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The 7-step sequence plus a final 'Review for completeness' step and 11-item 'Key Quality Checks' checklist provide a clear sequence and a validation pass, but there is no validate→fix→retry feedback loop and validation is a single end-of-process pass rather than integrated checkpoints.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Overview in SKILL.md points to two real, clearly-signaled, one-level-deep reference files ([references/style_contract.md], [references/structure_contract.md], both verified present) with easy navigation and no nested-reference chains.	3 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, well-formed description that names concrete deliverables, supplies explicit 'Triggered by' guidance answering both what and when, and occupies a distinct PE/VC niche. It mirrors the rubric's good examples closely.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete outputs — 'sector deep-dives, investment memos, and market analysis' and 'detailed PDF reports covering TMT, consumer, healthcare, and industrials' — matching the anchor for listing multiple specific concrete actions.	3 / 3
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ('Generate professional primary market / venture capital industry research reports...') and when ('Triggered by requests to analyze an industry, create a market report...'), satisfying the explicit-trigger requirement that would otherwise cap at 2.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Natural trigger phrases a user would say — 'analyze an industry', 'create a market report', 'write a sector deep-dive', 'PE/VC-style research document' — give good coverage of common variations.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Occupies a clear PE/VC primary-market research niche with distinct triggers, making it unlikely to fire for unrelated document or report skills.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: zebbern/claude-code-guide
Path: skills/vc-industry-research/SKILL.md
Commit: af7d491

Reviewed: about 8 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.