Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a concrete prompt template, YAML schema, and workflow, but it duplicates the prompt template inline instead of pointing to the existing reference file, and its batch-mutation workflow lacks an explicit validation checkpoint before applying results.
Suggestions
Replace the inlined prompt template with a one-line pointer to references/prompt-template.md to fix the duplication and surface the reference file.
Insert an explicit validation checkpoint in Step 4 (e.g. 'spot-check 5% of renames against the disassembly; roll back the IDB if mismatch rate exceeds X%') so the batch-apply workflow has a validate→fix→retry loop.
Trim the '核心优势' marketing-style cost-comparison table or move it to the reference, keeping only the operationally relevant cost figure (~1 元 / 200 functions).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient tables and code with no concept-explanation padding, but the full prompt template is duplicated inline (lines 72-144) while also living in references/prompt-template.md, and the '核心优势' cost-comparison table ('免费但耗命') is marketing-style padding — more than the minor trimmable instances at anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste-ready prompt template, a precise YAML output schema, concrete apply actions (idapro_rename / idapro_set_comments), and a Python skeleton in the reference; falls short of 5 because the IDA tool calls (e.g. idapro_disasm(addr=...)) are illustrative rather than verified-executable names. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence (准备数据→批量导出→LLM比对→应用结果→迭代) with a completion checklist exists, but this is a batch operation that mutates an IDB, and Step 4 applies renames with no explicit validate→fix→retry checkpoint before commit — the rubric's batch/destructive cap holds this at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section structure is reasonable, but the full prompt template — content that clearly belongs in the separate reference file — is inlined verbatim in the body, and references/prompt-template.md is never explicitly signaled or linked, matching the 'references present but not clearly signaled; content that should be separate is inline' anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |