CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

competition-malware-config

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for malware configuration recovery, staged payload boundaries, beacon parameter extraction, and IOC decoding. Use when the user asks to recover a malware config, decode C2 or beacon fields, unpack staged payloads, extract bot or campaign IDs, or tie recovered config to observed protocol behavior under sandbox assumptions. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

80

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

High

Do not use without reviewing

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, well-structured instruction-only skill: concise methodology, concrete actionable enumerations, a sequenced workflow with verification, and clean single-level reference disclosure. It hits the top anchor on every dimension without verbosity or concept re-explanation.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~45-line body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no re-explanation of what malware or entropy is — and every line is task guidance, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor rather than the level-2 "could be tightened" anchor.

3 / 3

Actionability

Concrete, specific guidance throughout — ordered transform chain "container -> compression -> encoding -> xor/substitution -> crypto -> parse", enumerated locations to inspect, and explicit field→behavior mappings — which clears the actionable bar for an instruction-only skill; per the rubric, absence of code is not penalized here since guidance is actionable.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced 3-phase workflow (Find Boundary → Reconstruct Decode Chain → Tie Config To Behavior) with an explicit verification step ("Reproduce the decoded config... from the smallest possible path") and a checklist reference covering pitfalls like "proving the full chain," matching the clear-sequence-with-validation anchor.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

A lean overview body with a single, well-signaled one-level-deep reference ("Load `references/malware-config.md`"), which is a real file containing the checklist and evidence rules — matching the clear-overview-with-one-level-references anchor.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A well-crafted description: concrete actions, an explicit Use-when trigger clause, natural terminology, and a tightly scoped niche, all in third-person voice. It clears the top anchor on every dimension with no over-claims or padding.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — "malware configuration recovery, staged payload boundaries, beacon parameter extraction, and IOC decoding" plus "decode C2 or beacon fields, unpack staged payloads, extract bot or campaign IDs" — matching the multi-action anchor rather than the single-domain level 2.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (the four recovery/extraction actions) and when via a full "Use when the user asks to recover a malware config..." clause, satisfying the both-what-and-when anchor; the level-2 anchor is missing the Use-when clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Natural CTF-analyst phrasing ("recover a malware config", "decode C2 or beacon fields", "unpack staged payloads", "extract bot or campaign IDs") gives good coverage of terms users would actually say, beyond jargon-only level 2.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly niche — scoped to malware config recovery as a downstream of `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` — with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, matching the clear-niche anchor.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.