CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

competition-request-normalization-smuggling

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for parser differentials, HTTP normalization gaps, ambiguous headers, path decoding drift, transfer-framing mismatches, and request smuggling routes. Use when the user asks to trace proxy and backend parse differences, conflicting path normalization, Host or forwarded-header ambiguity, CL/TE issues, or routing outcomes that differ across hops. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

72

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Critical

Do not install without reviewing

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Competition Request Normalization Smuggling

Use this skill only as a downstream specialization after $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator is already active and has established sandbox assumptions, node ownership, and evidence priorities. If that has not happened yet, return to $ctf-sandbox-orchestrator first.

Use this skill when request interpretation changes between proxy, middleware, and backend parser layers.

Reply in Simplified Chinese unless the user explicitly requests English.

Quick Start

  1. Map every parsing hop: client-facing proxy, gateway, app server, and downstream service.
  2. Record path normalization, header canonicalization, transfer framing, and host derivation at each hop.
  3. Capture one accepted baseline request and one differential request with minimal delta.
  4. Prove which hop interprets the request differently.
  5. Reproduce one minimal differential path that yields decisive behavior.

Workflow

1. Map Parse And Routing Boundaries

  • Record Host, forwarded headers, path decoding, slash collapsing, dot-segment handling, and case behavior.
  • Note Content-Length, Transfer-Encoding, chunk framing, and connection reuse behavior when relevant.
  • Keep edge parser and backend parser decisions side by side.

2. Prove Differential Interpretation

  • Build paired requests that differ in one canonicalization dimension only.
  • Capture proxy logs, backend logs, route match, and downstream request shape.
  • Show where route, auth scope, or body boundary diverges.

3. Reduce To Decisive Smuggling Chain

  • Compress to: crafted request -> parser differential across hops -> unintended routed request or hidden endpoint reach -> resulting effect.
  • State whether root cause is path normalization drift, header ambiguity, transfer framing differential, or host-derivation confusion.
  • If the chain becomes primarily runtime routing without framing tricks, hand off to runtime routing skill.

Read This Reference

  • Load references/request-normalization-smuggling.md for parse-differential checklist and evidence packaging.

What To Preserve

  • Raw request pairs, hop-by-hop interpretation, and final routed target
  • Exact normalization or framing delta that flips behavior
  • One minimal replayable differential request path
Repository
zhaoxuya520/reverse-skill
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.