Conciseness

Lean, checklist- and table-driven body with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place (terse workflow steps, compact tool table, short self-check).

Actionability

The memory section gives a fully executable Volatility block, but the host-artifact and network sections are checklist reminders ('□ 持久化：Run 键、服务、计划任务、WMI') without copy-paste commands or tool invocations, leaving guidance concrete but not consistently executable.

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced workflow (保全 → 内存 → 主机伪影 → 网络) with explicit preservation checkpoints (SHA256, read-only copy, chain of custody) and a closing task-completion self-check that acts as a validation checkpoint for a risky evidence-handling process.

Progressive Disclosure

A compact overview body with a single, clearly signaled one-level reference (references/forensics-triage.md, verified to exist) and organized sections; no nested reference chains.

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete forensics actions and artifact types — 'memory dumps, disk timelines, PCAP investigation, artifact triage, and IR evidence preservation' — rather than vague language.

Completeness

Clearly answers 'what' via the enumerated tasks, but the 'Use for...' clause is a general trigger rather than explicit 'Use when the user mentions...' guidance, so per the guidelines completeness is capped at 2.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms like 'digital forensics', 'memory dumps', and 'PCAP investigation', but misses common variations users say ('memory dump analysis', 'Volatility', 'packet capture', 'incident response') and lacks explicit trigger phrasing.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear, specific niche (authorized digital forensics / IR evidence preservation) with triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills; overlap with malware-analysis/threat-hunting is explicitly routed rather than conflated.